Monday 22 March 2010

Canton Arms, Stockwell

I’ve never been a fan of gastropubs. The concept of fancy, restaurant-standard nosh being served in the informal environs of a local boozer has always felt uncomfortable to me, an unwelcome example of two perfectly serviceable and separate entities encroaching on each other’s purpose - like listening to the radio on your television, or sending written messages via the telephone. As a result, I was less excited than others might be at the news that my local boozer, the recently-closed and sorely-missed Canton Arms in Stockwell, had been reborn not just as a gastropub, but as one where the food was attracting rave reviews from the big critics.

The only gastropub (and God, even that clunking neologism of a noun jars with me) I’ve ever really liked is the Anchor & Hope behind Waterloo Station. I was impressed by the absence of the pretension which seemed to afflict most others of its type, as well as by the fantastic quality and value of the food; I still go misty-eyed and drool a little when I think of the rabbit terrine I once had there. It softened the blow, therefore, to hear that the lady now in charge at Canton Arms is one Trish Hilferty – nope, I’d never heard of her, but Fay Maschler had which is fine by me – who once presided over the hot-plate at the Anchor & Hope (and ergo may well have been responsible for that terrine). Both having a day off last Friday, Alyn and I wandered round there - it takes a whole, ooh, minute from my flat – to try out a spot of lunch.

Pleasingly, the change of ownership hasn’t led to much of a change of decor. What before was a really nice, comfortable, friendly neighbourhood pub appears to have been left pretty much untouched, except that the back bit where there used to be cosy battered old sofas and a few tables for eating at now has only the latter, and has had a fresh lick of deep red paint to make it look vaguely restauranty. It’s a nice space to eat in; it’s not trying too hard to impress, tables are well-spaced and the high windows let in plenty of natural light. A decent number of other tables were occupied despite the fairly late hour, although interestingly the pub itself was otherwise deserted.

We were directed by a very friendly chap at the bar to a roomy corner table, and within a couple of minutes an equally smiley waitress brought tap water and good bread and butter. So far, so good. But then we looked at the menu, and things started to go downhill. It was so brief, and most of the dishes so insubstantial, that I wondered at first if we had been given a list of tapas. But no, the slip of paper was clearly headed ‘Lunch’ and I reproduce it in its entirety here:


Now, call me old-fashioned – and many do – but on a lunch menu in a pub gastro or otherwise, shouldn’t there be at least one failsafe dish such as a steak, pie or stew? To offer only two main dishes – that boring, bistro staple ‘omlette’ [sic] and lemon sole – and four tapas/starters smacks of a kitchen that has decided to serve what it wants to serve, and not what lunchtime customers might actually want. All the dishes sounded perfectly nice in their own right, but to our eyes that ultra-curt list did not a cohesive menu make. When I mentioned to the aforementioned friendly chap at the bar that it might have been welcome to see, say, a steak on the menu, I was told entirely uselessly that they had had onglet earlier in the week.

Given that we were hungry, and were going to the flicks in a couple of hours, we decided to stay put and try to cobble together a lunch out of what little was on offer. We ordered all of the first four dishes, plus a green salad, and a bottle of crisp, floral Le Vele 2006 Verdicchio to wash it all down with. To give it its due, the food was mostly good. The ‘Spanish ham’ – whether it was jabugo, or iberico, or pata negra, I couldn’t tell you, nor how many jotas it had; as far as the menu writer cared it was just ‘Spanish ham’ – was lovely, melt-in-the-mouth stuff and went very nicely when chewed with a mouthful of the perfectly fine omelette. The devilled lamb’s kidneys were superb, full of robust flavour enhanced by the tangy liquor they bathed in; the accompanying ‘toast’ had no crunch or notable flavour but at least absorbed the tasty juices.

Less successful was the cuttlefish, which was over-cooked, swimming in too much of the intensely powerful ink and not a patch on the cuttlefish dish I enjoyed recently at Rivington. Sauted potatoes were, without forewarning, substituted for the chips which should have come with the omelette; I don’t mind things being substituted provided that a) I’m told about it and b) the replacement item is good. Neither was the case here, and when I mentioned this to the waiter it was met with indifference. It comes to something when the best thing we ate, and the only dish to really stand out, was the green salad, which was a generous mound of super-fresh peppery leaves dressed in a perfect quantity of extremely good vinaigrette.

Overall, we were both entirely underwhelmed by the experience. The food really was nothing special – omelette, for God’s sake, is fine for Cafe Rouge, but in a gastropub? – if reasonably enough priced; our bill came to comfortably under fifty quid even including that nice bottle of wine. Yes, service was mostly lovely, but undermined by the staff’s incredulous response to anything other than fulsome praise; perhaps the galaxy of stars bestowed by Jay and Fay has gone to their heads already. I want this to be as good as the real critics believe it to be, because who wouldn’t want a stonkingly good gastrogaff practically on their doorstep? Even given my antipathy to them, I certainly would. But until I see evidence to the contrary – and I’ll certainly give Canton Arms a second shot – I remain to be convinced that I do.

Canton Arms, 177 South Lambeth Road, London SW8 1XP Tel: 020 7582 8710 No website. Canton Arms on Urbanspoon

13 comments:

  1. You're right, my husband wouldn't fancy anything off that menu. How very odd.

    PS wot, no foie gras sarnie?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Exactly - I'm fairly adventurous but poor Alyn was really bamboozled by the lack of choice. And no, no sign of the 'famous' foie gras toastie on our visit; maybe next time!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting, Hugh, I used to go to the Canton Arms a lot when I was living in the area and, at that time, the food was pretty good; more pub-grubby but, on the whole, good.

    It feels like they've gone a little the other way, nothing wrong in my view with coupling some old favourites done *really* well alongside some more exotic options.

    This way, if (as described) your 'creativity' doesn't hit the mark, you can comfortably claim you can do a damn good steak.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'd previously considered the long(ish) trundle down the Northern Line to try The Canton Arms. I think I'm going to give it a month or two now - great post and a fine 'heads up'.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks Neil, I think that's a good idea; I do think the place has potential but isn't worth a trip south in its own right!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wow that is the kind of menu that would make me stay for one drink then move on elsewhere for food. Glad you posted this as I had been considering heading down for the foie gras toastie...

    ReplyDelete
  7. If we hadn't been hungry and pushed for time we'd have moved on too; it wasn't bad food, just a lousy menu. On Sunday when we walked past again the menu looked much more appealing so I'll give it a second chance as it's so nearby!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I live locally as well and used to be a regular at the old Canton Arms. Popped round for dinner last Thursday to see what all the fuss was about. Both starter (cullen skink) and pud (syrup pudding) were fine, but main (braised rabbit w/fennel and bayonne ham) was only so-so. Will be eating there again, but only when the mains of the day appeal.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I live locally and have done for a few years now - so it suprises me that other people have posted that the food used to be good at the Canton - perhaps this was over 3 years ago? I went down there myself afew times and the menu was full of things like burger and chips,fish and chips, bangers and mash etc. Not a problem if done well but I found it all to have come straight froma microwave or a deep fat fryer.
    I for one am glad we have the new Canton in our area, an advise those who want a steak or bangers and mash to look elsewhere. I find the bloggers comment that they dont generally like gastropubs a bit bizarre - what is wrong with good food in pub surroundings? As with the comment about being baffled by an omlette being on the menu - Locatelli's has scrambled egg on theirs, if done well it shouldnt be a problem.

    ReplyDelete
  10. What a shame. I went there specifically to try their toasties (which were excellent) and had a chat with Trish about their short lunch menu. She was keen for the food to be very simple at lunch time with things like Scotch Pies and gourmet toasties to bolster the menu and then more interesting in the evening.

    Ultimately, it's the locals like you that matter. They should me making you feel like this is an extension of your kitchen and living room.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It's far better for dinner

    ReplyDelete
  12. On the day we visited Jason the specials board was bare; either there hadn't been any or they'd already sold out! That teeny-tiny menu genuinely was all there was to choose from. I know that at dinner there's a wider choice, I may even go back sometime to to try it.

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...